奈良女子大学学術情報リポジトリ

WEKO3

To

lat lon distance

[[sub_check.contents]]

[[sub_check.contents]]

[[sub_radio.contents]]

To

Field does not validate

[[sub_attr.contents]]　

インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

アイテム

Insubordination and Its Conditions: How Is the If + Not [P] Construction Licensed?

http://hdl.handle.net/10935/5448

名前 / ファイル	ライセンス	アクション
an10065983v35pp25-35.pdf

Item type

default_紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1)

公開日

2020-06-10

タイトル

タイトル

Insubordination and Its Conditions: How Is the If + Not [P] Construction Licensed?

言語

en

言語

言語

eng

資源タイプ

資源タイプ識別子

http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501

資源タイプ

departmental bulletin paper

著者

ja	平尾,恵美
ja-Kana	ひらお,えみ
en	Hirao,Emi

Search repository

内容記述

内容記述タイプ

Abstract

内容記述

This paper examines “the If + not [P] construction" (e.g. [when Peter encounters Tom, he says,] “Well, if it isn't Tom!"). This is one type of expressive “insubordination," which Evans (2007) defines as “the conventionalized main clause use of what, on prima facie grounds, appear to be formally subordinate clauses." Although this construction has been touched on in previous studies, the question of how the construction is licensed has not been adequately answered. To solve this issue, which is perhaps the most important issue of the construction, this paper focuses on the construction's licensing conditions. In this paper, we will address the following three main points. First, this paper defines the licensing conditions of the construction with reference to Hirao (2018a, 2019). By analyzing examples drawn from movies, novels, and daily conversation, this paper proposes three formal, semantic, and pragmatic conditions, whose validity is demonstrated by the fact that examples constructed to violate them are not accepted. Second, this paper confirms the validity of the conditions, which Hirao (2018a, 2019) did not sufficiently discuss. Only expressions that satisfy all three conditions are regarded as examples of the construction. Furthermore, using extracts from movies, we argue that, if not all three conditions are satisfied, then an utterance cannot be considered an example of the construction, even if it is grammatical and/or it makes sense. That is to say, the conditions are essential for characterizing the construction. Third, this paper newly reveals the complex relationships among the conditions. The semantic condition imposes further restrictions on what is already narrowed down by the formal condition, while the pragmatic condition functions independently of the other two conditions. Additionally, there are no instances that satisfy the formal and semantic conditions without also satisfying the pragmatic condition. Interestingly, these relationships correspond with what Goldberg (1995, 2006) identifies as a construction.

言語

en

書誌情報

ja : 人間文化研究科年報

巻 35, p. 25-36, 発行日 2020-03-31

出版者

出版者

奈良女子大学大学院人間文化研究科

言語

ja

ISSN

収録物識別子タイプ

PISSN

収録物識別子

0913-2201

著者版フラグ

出版タイプ

VoR

出版タイプResource

http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85

戻る

0

views

	Views

Versions

Ver.1

2024-03-11 06:29:18.535563

Show All versions

Share

Cite as

エクスポート

OAI-PMH

JPCOAR 2.0
JPCOAR 1.0
DublinCore
DDI

Other Formats

JSON
BIBTEX