WEKO3
インデックスリンク
アイテム
複数テキストの統合的理解に関する文献的検討:認知的側面・感情的側面・認識論的信念に着目して
http://hdl.handle.net/10935/5814
http://hdl.handle.net/10935/5814e0ef07de-7350-4de6-80b3-0b587c04da2e
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
issn09132201v37pp65-76.pdf
|
|
| アイテムタイプ | default_紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2022-06-29 | |||||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||||
| タイトル | 複数テキストの統合的理解に関する文献的検討:認知的側面・感情的側面・認識論的信念に着目して | |||||||||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||||||||
| 言語 | ||||||||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||||
| 主題 | 複数テキスト | |||||||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||||
| 主題 | 文章理解 | |||||||||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||||||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||||||||
| その他（別言語等）のタイトル | ||||||||||||
| その他のタイトル | A review of integration and comprehension for reading multiple texts: Cognitive processing, aff ective stances, and epistemic belief | |||||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||||
| 著者 |
向野下,紋香
× 向野下,紋香
|
|||||||||||
| 内容記述 | ||||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||||||||
| 内容記述 | In recent years, the need for competency when it comes to comprehending and integrating information from multiple texts is growing more important. The goal of integration from multiple documents is typically to compose coherent, eaningful representations of a topic or issue shared by available sources. This article reviews research and theory concerning integration from multiple texts, focusing especially on three diff erent facets of reading multiple documents: cognitive processing, the reader's affective stance on a topic, and the reader's epistemic belief. Moreover, as orientation for further research, needs for considering the various relations among multiple documents are discussed. Most of the previous studies in this area have targeted reader comprehension in situations where the relation among multiple texts is confl icting or contradictory, which is limiting because people also encounter multiple sources involving relations that are complementary or in agreement over the course of daily reading activity. A few studies have suggested that two types of multiple-document relation, confl icting and complementary, diff er in terms of the cognitive processing involved in comprehension of the author's viewpoint, the recognition of links between the contents and the sources, and the length of reading time. Therefore, when people read multiple texts that have various types of relation, how do individual variables such as affective stance and epistemic belief affect comprehension? This is a remaining issue for future research. | |||||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||||
| 書誌情報 |
ja : 人間文化総合科学研究科年報 巻 37, p. 65-76, 発行日 2022-03-31 |
|||||||||||
| 出版者 | ||||||||||||
| 出版者 | 奈良女子大学大学院人間文化総合科学研究科 | |||||||||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||||||||
| ISSN | ||||||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | PISSN | |||||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | 0913-2201 | |||||||||||
| 著者版フラグ | ||||||||||||
| 出版タイプ | VoR | |||||||||||
| 出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 | |||||||||||
