WEKO3
インデックスリンク
アイテム
An Examination of the Controversy over English Nominal Tautologies
http://hdl.handle.net/10935/3339
http://hdl.handle.net/10935/3339c864c4cb-78bd-495f-a390-437fe022dcd6
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
AN10065983V28pp13-28.pdf
|
|
| アイテムタイプ | default_紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2013-04-30 | |||||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||||
| タイトル | An Examination of the Controversy over English Nominal Tautologies | |||||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||||
| 言語 | ||||||||||||
| 言語 | eng | |||||||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||||
| 主題 | atributiveness | |||||||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||||
| 主題 | objection | |||||||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||||
| 主題 | tautology | |||||||||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||||||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||||||||
| 著者 |
山本,尚子
× 山本,尚子
|
|||||||||||
| 内容記述 | ||||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||||||||
| 内容記述 | Many researchers have been fascinated by nominal tautological expressions such as Business is business and War is war and have attempted to solve the mystery they present with radical pragmatic approaches, radical semantic approaches, and non-radical approaches. Moreover, in recent years, two new waves have emerged: cognitive linguistic approaches and relevance theoretic approaches. Several related articles have been published on English nominal tautology. However, there is controversy as to how the expressions are interpreted, and no one has succeeded in characterizing their interpretations properly. Is it possible to include cases of English nominal tautology in a unified viewpoint analysis? As a starting point for clarifying the overall picture of the interpretation process of English nominal tautology, this paper examines previous English nominal tautology studies, and attempts to identify their problematic points. In the course of observing the data in detail, I find that the function of the English nominal tautology A is A is to express an objection to an utterance or a thought that is attributed to someone other than the speaker at the utterance point. On the basis of this finding, I suggest that there are two factors involved in the process of interpreting English nominal tautology: objection and attributiveness. How large a range of English nominal tautology data can be covered by this function will be a subject of my future research. | |||||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||||
| 書誌情報 |
ja : 人間文化研究科年報 巻 28, p. 13-28, 発行日 2013-03-31 |
|||||||||||
| 出版者 | ||||||||||||
| 出版者 | 奈良女子大学大学院人間文化研究科 | |||||||||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||||||||
| ISSN | ||||||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | PISSN | |||||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | 0913-2201 | |||||||||||
| 書誌レコードID | ||||||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | AN10065983 | |||||||||||
| 著者版フラグ | ||||||||||||
| 出版タイプ | VoR | |||||||||||
| 出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 | |||||||||||
